The Medical Patients’ Voices Must Be Represented In Cannabis Legalization

The Medical Patients’ Voices Must Be Represented In Cannabis Legalization
By Jason Barker (Medical Cannabis Patient & Organizer -LECUA Patient’s Coalition Of New Mexico)(monsanto.com 2016)
      A review of recent headlines in a number of states with medical cannabis highlights the huge financial profits. And the same around the cannabis legalization discussion within some of the biggest national cannabis advocacy groups.  What’s missing? The voice of the medical cannabis patients and those in the medical cannabis community.
The current debate and coverage focuses on legalization and regulation combining the interests of everyone from big pharma to big AG to recreational users to growers to government. Without the interests of medical cannabis patient community represented in this debate, we all run the great risk of establishing a future framework that is setup to take away patient cultivation rights, fails to protect the medical patient, and will require further modification.
The pharmaceutical industry both has much to gain and much to lose from legalization of the cannabis plant in its various natural forms.  What that industry does not want is to be competing with a natural plant that anyone can grow in their backyard, which actually works better than very expensive pharmaceuticals without side effects.
The absence of the medical cannabis patients voice has been furthered silenced by groups who have strayed from their original mission such as Drug Policy Alliance (DPA) and Marijuana Policy Project (MPP).  George Soros’ Open Society Foundation is listed as a major financial supporter of DPA in its annual report of 2013.  As the influence of theses financial donations from companies the vast majority of medical cannabis patients want nothing to do with, in May of this year, Bayer AG, the giant German chemical and pharmaceutical company, made a bid to buy Monsanto.  According the Wall Street Journal these merger talks have picked back up, with Bayer increasing its purchase offer,  as of  July 19th 2016.  
Both companies are said to be working on a synthetic cannabis-based extract. In 2003 the German Bayer AG then signed an agreement with GW Pharmaceuticals for joint research on a cannabis-based extract. In 2007, Bayer AG agreed to an exchange of technology with . . . Monsanto . . . . Thus Monsanto has discreet access to the work of the cannabis plant and its genetic modification. In 2009 GW Pharmaceuticals announced that it had succeeded in genetically altering a cannabis plant and patented a new breed of cannabis according to the Cannabinoid Research Institute division of GW Pharmaceuticals. Billionaires George Soros and the late Peter Lewis have bankrolled much of the cannabis legalization movement since 2012, providing Drug Policy Alliance (DPA) and Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) the bulk of their funding.
Look what happened in Washington state on July 1st 2016 when patients lost safe access to medical cannabis- that new approach to their program was funded by George Soros and his influence on DPA as revealed by the Seattle Times on September 22, 2012. George Soros is one of the biggest and most important shareholders of Monsanto Agrochemical Company and Halliburton. Peter Lewis got his source of great wealth from Progressive Insurance. The following chart, from The Washington Times, shows how this funding was provided in further detail.
The debate about cannabis legalization is complex and encompasses many different aspects from dispensary/producer models, to the rights of medical cannabis patients, from America’s right to freedom of choice, to large-scale big pharma and big AG commercialization into cannabis. When the legalization conversation does include medical cannabis issues, much of the focus is on profits from the medical cannabis dispensaries.  Highlighting these profits now in a cannabis industry which origins stemmed from a grassroots movement based on the medicinal values of cannabis – not profits.

Natural health writer Mike Adams warns:

“[W]ith the cannabis industry predicted to generate over $13 billion by 2020, becoming one of the largest agricultural markets in the nation, there should be little doubt that companies like Monsanto are simply waiting for Uncle Sam to remove the herb from its current Schedule I classification before getting into the business.

. . . [O]ther major American commodities, like corn and soybeans, are on average between 88 and 91 percent genetically modified. Therefore, once the cannabis industry goes national, and that is most certainly primed to happen, there will be no stopping the inevitability of cannabis becoming a prostituted product of mad science and shady corporate monopoly tactics.” (Sounds like Ultra Health in New Mexico if you ask this patient.)

As legalization of cannabis has spread, now these fears of large corporate ownership of the emerging cannabis industry are upon the cannabis community.  Arizona, California, and Nevada are some of the states heading to the voting booth this fall to vote on legalization and regulation of cannabis. Now is the time to put forth efforts in the medical cannabis community to make sure the legacy growers in California’s legendary Emerald Triangle remain a core part of the market. The time to ensure medical cannabis patient grow rights are protected from bad laws like the 25 mile no grow law in Arizona, where as medical cannabis patients can not grow if they live within 25 miles of a dispensary.
In New Mexico there are more headlines currently of the medical cannabis producers profits than of the law breaking administrative delays by the state of New Mexico’s Department of Health Medical Cannabis Office, that started in late February 2016. This violation of New Mexico law in the Lynn & Erin Compassionate Use Act, 2007 (LECUA), requires the state Department of Health to process and issue a medical cannabis patient id card in 30 days, while patients are waiting 60 days or more and this continues to disrupt safe access to medicine. Anita Briscoe (MS, APRN-BC), of Heal My Mind, said in April 2016 and May 2016 alone there were  84 of her patients that had experienced these delay exceeding 50 days.  
Fundamental to this discussion are the interests of the more than 25,000 New Mexicans who use medical cannabis and know how best to monitor medical cannabis to safely and effectively treat themselves, the state of New Mexico’s medical cannabis history started in 1978. In the United States, as of a March 2016 study on ProCog.org, there were over 1,246,170 million legal medical cannabis patients. Thats an average of 8.6 patients per 1,000 state residents in each state; Arizona 13.1 per 1000, California 19.4 per 1000, Colorado 19.8 per 1000, New Mexico 12.5 per 1000*, Oregon 19.2 per 1000, Nevada 5.0 per 1000 and Washington 19.2 per 1000 state residents. (*June 2016 NM DoH MCP Report)
To understand medical cannabis, it helps to understand the path to choosing it. Medical cannabis can be a last line of treatment for those who have unsuccessfully tried pharmaceuticals. When pharmaceuticals are successful, the side-effects of treatments — for 21 health conditions classified by Department Of Health in New Mexico eligible for medical cannabis — can be especially intense and unbearable causing patients to either seek other options, or incorporate cannabis into their regimen to ease these symptoms.(KOAT Albuquerque-May 6, 2016)
For example, a person living with multiple sclerosis (MS) may change treatments three or more times because the side-effects are excruciating, including recurring hot flashes, tissue degradation, digestive problems or hair loss. On the other hand, patients may avoid pharmaceutical treatments altogether, opting for a more “natural” option — as is their choice.
The medical industry works hard to ensure treatments are safe and effective, but sometimes the results are not optimal and another option is examined and prescribed. Throughout this process, physicians need to be able to look after patients’ best interests without fear of recommending medical cannabis and the lack of understanding by doctors of cannabis as a medicine must become non-existent. You, the patient, will always be your best advocate for your health and the medical profession all to often forgets we; as medical cannabis patients we hired them to work for us and our health.
We need to define a model for cannabis legalization, that keeps medical cannabis and puts patients first as well, and allows their physicians to provide the same level of care with medical cannabis as they do with other medications.
Prohibition of cannabis in the United States has largely denied the medical community the chance to study the effects this plant has on the human body so we have quite a bit of catching up to do. Patients need more trained nurses and health professionals with the ability to guide patients in the right direction, to support them on their journey to wellness with medical cannabis.
Understanding where your medication comes from and what exactly is in it is critical. While understandable that the current legal landscape discourages dispensaries from disclosing their sources, this is one thing that must change in order for us to progress toward medical standardization. If we are to treat medical cannabis as a true medicine, then we must adhere to the golden rule in medicine, “first, do no harm” or “primum non nocere”.
Patients are critical to the success of future legalization and regulation of cannabis in the United States, and specifically medical cannabis. The needs of 1,246,170 million medical cannabis patients reported by ProCon.org March 2016,  who rely on medical cannabis as their primary medicine are the fundamental criteria that will guide and help shape a positive trajectory for legalization. This should be the real true focus, not big pharma and big AG throwing money at advocacy groups to influence policy to favor profits over the medical cannabis patient community.
(Why you should speak up in favor of  Medical Cannabis – medicalcannabis.net)
Lastly, it’s important for all people within OUR medical cannabis community to know THEY are the power; the government, legislators & policy makers are lead to us and WE have the power to change the laws and government – people in it, policy being written, and overturning rules & regulations that disrupt safe access to our medicine. Not one state’s medical cannabis law is perfect, they are working pieces of democracy and this is where WE can establish patient lead policy in New Mexico and throughout the United States. We have the science, the research, the knowledge – the information the policy makers don’t have and we need to get it in front of legislators.
These patients’ needs and experiences regarding medical cannabis must be represented and fully considered by those we vote and elect into office as they make decisions on regulations for a legal cannabis marketplace for both cannabis and medical cannabis.  “The best advocate is an informed advocate. The history of medical cannabis advocacy is a rich one, filled with brave individuals like you. The key to being an effective advocate is a firm understanding of our history, the political landscape in which you are operating, the rules of engagement and the ability to articulate your needs.” – Americans For Safe Access
Get Involved Now Your Medical Cannabis Community Needs You:

LECUA Patient’s Coalition Of New Mexico Advocacy Group
LECUA Patients Coalition of New Mexico Community Page
Find My New Mexico Legislator
Americans For Safe Access

Advertisements

One thought on “The Medical Patients’ Voices Must Be Represented In Cannabis Legalization

  1. Great article, with important focus on medical marijuana patients being fully informed, working collectively, and being their own best advocates. The late un-great “patient organizations” that claim to represent our interests — and their Drug Reform financial backers — don't really represent us or our interests, with the California chapter of ASA actually backing the MMRSA last year which attempts to gut the centerpiece of charitable community-based access by banning vertically integrated (seed to smoke) patient owned and operated cooperatives. Given our medical rights will be measured in lives saved and lost, patients need more than just our voices in the debate as popularly pitiful poster children. Enough of our family and friends have fallen along the way already to make me believe that this big Pot profit party and their corporate wet-dreamers in big AG and big Pharma – no matter how uniquely American they might be – are in for a sad surprise. California voters rested ownership of cannabis (naturales) with the people whose health and wellness depend on our dedication as guardians of a botanical miracle and stewards of its healing gifts. History will record just what we were willing to lay down and what we weren't in fulfilling our obligations to our own medical needs and the needs of those who will follow us.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s